Lexus CT200h Forums banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
661 Posts
If this were to be put into production, the rear would have to be more bubbly like a ISC. Just as the ISC, looks great with the top down, but terrible with the top up.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
169 Posts
Why not? Because it'll be a hacked hatchback, which will be a bad compromise compared to a car that's been designed as a convertible from the start.

I know, it's not cool among consumerists to talk about function over form, but that's just my opinion. I don't really care how good it looks (can't see it when I'm driving the car anyway), I want it to perform its function well. A hacked hatchback is just too much of a functional compromise.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
516 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Why not? Because it'll be a hacked hatchback, which will be a bad compromise compared to a car that's been designed as a convertible from the start.

I know, it's not cool among consumerists to talk about function over form, but that's just my opinion. I don't really care how good it looks (can't see it when I'm driving the car anyway), I want it to perform its function well. A hacked hatchback is just too much of a functional compromise.
One question...did you have the name TERMIN8R before the Arnold fiasco or afterwards?
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top